Wednesday, 15 November 2017

Watch: Viewers believe there’s an F-bomb in the latest Paddington Christmas ad


An English accent can be a tricky affair, even when it involves the beloved kids’ favourite character, Paddington the Bear.

Paddington Christmas ad for Marks & Spencer [Image: M&S/YouTube]

Paddington recently starred in the latest Marks & Spencer Christmas ad and many people believe they heard an f-bomb in the heartwarming commercial.

The ad, included below, shows Paddington lying in bed on the night before Christmas, while hoping to receive marmalade. He suddenly hears a thump on the roof. When Paddington climbs up to the roof, he bumps into a character, dressed all in red, who he immediately believes to be Santa Claus. Meanwhile, said character is actually a burglar, who has been swanning around the neighbourhood, stealing families’ Christmas gifts.




Paddington, being the nice bear he is, offers to help Santa Claus deliver all the gifts. He recognizes many of the names on the parcels and wants to make sure they get to their rightful owners.

As the burglar and Paddington complete their deliveries, they spot a family, hugging and happy over their Christmas gifts. The burglar is apparently moved by the whole situation and has finally discovered the true meaning of Christmas.

Before he leaves, the burglar gives Paddington a huge bear hug, and says, “Thank you, little bear.” There’s only one problem – many viewers heard this a little differently and believe the burglar actually said, “F**k you, little bear.”  Enjoy watching the video here, and let us know in the comment section exactly what you hear.


Naturally Twitter came alive to the story, with many funny posts, believing the burglar should be placed on Santa’s “naughty list.” However some people only heard the words “Thank you.” 















Meanwhile, the new “Paddington” film is set for release in the U.S. this coming January (with no f-bombs included).

Wednesday, 8 November 2017

Birmingham man dies after massive firework exploded in his home



A man in Birmingham has died and his partner has suffered multiple leg fractures after an arson attack with a huge firework, leading to a murder enquiry.


Tony Nicholls' home after the arson attack - screen capture from YouTube/Showbiz Us-Uk


Tony Nicholls, 56, suffered from severe burns and smoke inhalation after a large firework, said to consist of approximately 200 tubes of explosives, was placed in his Birmingham home and set alight. The firework caused a massive blaze in the house, severely injuring Nicholls and leading to his partner jumping to safely from a window upstairs and suffering several leg fractures.

Nicholls was taken by firefighters to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham on Thursday for treatment for severe burns and smoke inhalation from the fire and was placed in an induced coma. However, he didn’t regain consciousness and passed away early on Tuesday morning. Birmingham police have now launched a murder enquiry into the incident.



The downstairs floor of the property was left blackened by the blaze, which ripped through the home at around 11 p.m. on Thursday. Firefighters believe the massive firework likely took two minutes to fully discharge, quickly setting the home on fire.

According to a report by the Birmingham Mail, police had said in an earlier statement that the firework was a multi-shot commercial firework, around 2ft x 1ft in size and that once ignited, it would have lasted for approximately two minutes. They stated that the type of firework is normally used for an outdoor public firework display, adding that the impact inside a small house would have been terrifying.

As reported by the Guardian, West Midlands Police are urging anyone who has sold a firework of this type, or is missing one, to contact Detective Inspector Paul Joyce of the Homicide team. 



Joyce said the huge firework would have been heavy to carry for any distance and he urges anyone who spotted a person carrying a large box in the neighbourhood to contact police. After Nicholl’s death, Joyce said they are treating the incident as a murder enquiry. He said they are following up on several active lines of enquiry and are particularly looking into CCTV in the local community, which may have picked up the suspect.

Nicholl’s partner is still in hospital, being treated for her injuries. His daughter thanked emergency services, as well as medical staff at the hospital, for caring and treating her father.

Police have asked anyone with information relating to the incident to contact police locally on 101, or to phone Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Friday, 21 July 2017

New Hampshire 6-year-old boy revived with Narcan after possible opioid overdose

As the opioid epidemic continues across the U.S., a 6-year-old boy had to be revived with Narcan after found unconscious from an alleged opioid overdose

Photo Narcan pen seen on sidewalk outside apartment screen capture from YouTube/WMUR-TV

In what is considered to be the first time the narcotic antidote had been used on a child in the state of New Hampshire, a six-year-old was revived with Narcan at 6 a.m. on Tuesday morning, after suffering a possible overdose.

Child overdoses on opioids in a Manchester apartment

Police responded to a Manchester apartment on Tuesday morning to find a six-year-old boy, lying unresponsive from a possible overdose of some kind of opioid drug. According to Manchester Police, the boy came around as soon as Narcan was administered.

Now detectives are investigating the incident as a possible overdose as Narcan will only revive someone exposed to an opioid. Lt. Brian O’Keefe told WBZ that it was “gut-wrenching,” saying it was particularly tough on their officers, who regularly respond to overdose calls, but not calls involving young children. 

One of the paramedics who responded to the scene said he had never seen the anti-overdose drug used on a child in his more than two decades on the job.




So far no arrests have been made and the child was still in hospital on Thursday and in a stable condition. However the child will be placed in the care of another relative, other than those he was with when he suffered the overdose. Police have not released the type of opioid drug the six-year-old boy was exposed to, or which family members he was with at the time of the overdose. However, O’Keefe said when a young child is involved it could be something as simple as touching something in the home, like a kitchen table, sink or a doorknob. He said if there are trace amounts of an opiate derivative such as fentanyl or carfentanyl, the results could have been far worse.

According to the Drug Enforcement Administration, opioids are easily absorbed even with simple skin contact and the drug takes effect very quickly. They say just 2 or 3 milligrams of fentanyl could be fatal. However, when it comes to a child, it would take only 1 to 1.5 milligrams to have a fatal effect.


New Hampshire becomes a focal point in the U.S. opioid epidemic

According to AMR communications director Kim Warth, New Hampshire has become a focal point for the opioid epidemic in America. According to CNN, there have been 176 youths from 10 to 19 years of age involved in opioid-related visits to the emergency room, while five children under the age of ten have also been hospitalized.


Children should never be exposed to opioids

Neighbors in the area are shocked and concerned over the child’s overdose incident, with Al Pellerin saying you cannot let a six-year-old be exposed to something like this and almost die from the experience.



Tuesday, 18 July 2017

American Airlines flight evacuated due to man passing gas? Maybe not

An American Airlines flight had landed at Raleigh-Durham International Airport when passengers were evacuated due to nausea and headaches.



According to an airport official at Raleigh-Durham International Airport in North Carolina, an American Airlines flight had to be evacuated after a man passed gas so violently it caused people to suffer headaches and nausea. However, the airline does acknowledge there was a bad odor, but says it wasn’t a passenger’s gas.

Rumors spread worldwide of American Airlines 'gassy' evacuation

These days there are many horror stories in the media about various airlines, including American Airlines. News of the latest incident soon went viral worldwide due to its almost humorous (and very human) “gassy” nature. It reportedly happened on July 16 at around 4 p.m. when the passenger on the plane allegedly “passed gas” so violently the smell was overpowering, causing fellow passengers to become ill. The RDU official reportedly said the smell was so bad, fellow passengers became nauseous and developed headaches, leading to them being rushed off the plane. While the American Airlines flight in question was not identified, it was landing at Raleigh-Durham airport to avoid being diverted.



Officials at the airport later said in a statement that there had been a “medical issue” on the American Airlines flight after passengers suffered eye irritations and headaches, and that a passenger had been treated by Wake County Emergency Medical Services. The International Business Times reported that a lack of more information left many questions unanswered, as it is unsure whether the passenger boarded the plane in an unwell condition or became “gassy” during the flight.

Meanwhile, and as noted by the Charlotte Observer, American Airlines issued a statement to say one of their planes at the Raleigh-Durham airport was taken out of service over a bad odor, but the spokesperson said it was definitely not due to “passed gas.”  Their statement said an American Airlines plane traveling from Charlotte to the Raleigh-Durham airport had landed at 2:19 p.m. and was out of service over a mechanical issue, along with a bad odor in the cabin. The statement went on to stress that this odor was not caused by “passed gas” as had been widely reported in the media. 

CBS North Carolina later learned that it was crew members who complained about the odor and that this was after the passengers had left the plane. However this, along with the airline’s statement, went contrary to the earlier alleged statement by the airport official, so we’ll probably never know for sure.

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

‘Hey, hey, hey goodbye’ to Steam’s Gary DeCarlo at 75 years of age



The singer that brought us one of the most recognized songs ever has passed away from lung cancer at the age of 75.


Photo via Wikimedia by Fontana / Fair Use


Gary DeCarlo, the lead singer of the band Steam, has reportedly passed away at the age of 75 after a battle with lung cancer.




DeCarlo and his band Steam are best known for their 1969 hit song, “Na Na Hey Hey Kiss him Goodbye,” which went on to become one of the most well known songs of the time.




A close friend of DeCarlo, Pat Horgan, told TMZ that he passed away in hospice care in Connecticut with his wife by his side. DeCarlo had been battling with lung cancer, which eventually spread, affecting the rest of his body.

His hit song was famously chanted in Congress recently after the House moved to pass the Obamacare repeal.



RIP Gary DeCarlo.

Saturday, 17 June 2017

Michigan man wrongfully accused of murder released after 41 years

Ledura Watkins, 61, was accused of first-degree-murder in a 1975 fatal shooting and has finally had his innocence confirmed.

Ledura Watkins - screen capture from Fox 2 video

61-year-old Ledura Watkins spent four decades in jail for a crime he didn’t commit. He was convicted of first-degree murder based on a hair found at the scene and sentenced to life behind bars. Watkins was released from the Wayne County Jail in Detroit on June 15 after legal experts overturned his conviction.

41 years behind bars for an innocent man

Watkins was 20 years of age when a court found him guilty of the first-degree murder of a teacher, Yvette Ingram, 25, during a robbery at her home. His guilt was based on the hair found by police forensic analysts on the victim’s pants at the scene of the murder.

Watkins case was taken by the Innocence Project, set up by the Western Michigan University-Cooley Law School who, based on the flimsy evidence found at the scene, asked the court to set aside Watkins’ conviction in January this year.

According to the Innocence Project director, Marla Mitchell-Cichon, the hair comparison carried out at that time was not based on science. She said it was just based on a lab analyst’s opinion and that it had no place in system of criminal justice. Mitchell-Cichon went on to say a state-wide review is essential in hair comparison cases.

Once the Innocence Project took up Watkins’ case and spoke about the flimsy evidence which convicted their client, the Wayne County prosecutor’s office agreed that the evidence in the case was flawed under new FBI standards for hair comparison.

Freedom for the Michigan man at last

When Watkins was released from Wayne County Jail on Thursday, he said it felt “really surreal” and that it was unbelievable to be released after so much time. Watkins, who had always denied involvement in the crime, did say he is feeling great and that he expected it to happen, but he didn’t believe it would take so long.




Watkins went on to say he was looking forward to enjoying dinner with his family and that it would probably be in a Chinese restaurant. He added that it has taken years to get to this point and he doesn’t ever want to touch a law book again.

According to a report by Fox 2, under a new Michigan law, Watkins may be eligible for a $50,000 payment for every year in compensation for the time spent behind bars. Prof. Norman Fell, Executive Director of the Innocence Project said that is the next phase and as the bill has now been passed, Watkins could be eligible.

Second Michigan inmate to recently have a conviction overturned by the Innocence Project

According to a report by the IBTimes, Watkins is the second inmate in Michigan to have a conviction overturned in recent weeks. In May, Desmond Ricks was released after spending 25 years in prison for the murder of a friend. The Innocence Project also took up his case, where it was found by analysis that the two bullets removed from the victim did not match the murder weapon placed in evidence at the 1992 trial.